Actually there IS a perfect answer. The 3. In 5 hours I will play Stellaris with my friends. You want to find all the enclaves asap, kill monsters for more tech, and just generally get that tech up. . . 5K Online. . /rantThe second vassal everyone will want is the Scholarium, who provides a significant bonus to research potential and valuable science tribute. Been playing stellaris for a little bit now let’s say a couple of months and I was wondering if playing tall is worth it I’ve heard mixed opinions on the topic but if it is worth it could you all give me some tips!Well there is a method of playing 'tall'. I like tall play style but it currently requires more resource density and pop efficiency to work. Traits wise, probably grab the usual Deviant Unruly Intelligent Natural Engineer combination. Weekly PSA's PSA- the definition of playing wide is disputed, and many people use systems as opposed to planets as the model in Stellaris. | Paradox Interactive Forums. Hegemon. r/Stellaris. If you play tall right, you can get more than 15000 tech per month mid game. . Wide empires have more pops. I feel that nihilistic aquisition is the KEY to playing tall. Friendly-General-723 Collective Consciousness 8 mo. Small. Equilibrius Coastal Raider. Especially if you've been away for 1-2 years. For this approach, you'd want origins that can benefit as early as possible from. It has factiond designed for playing tall. stellaris is a dynamic game, and rebellions and other events always change up the galaxy. Spoken like someone who isn’t even seven feet tall! Step 1: get boxed in by superior powers. Add a Comment. #7. Every time. I believe the large consensus among Stellaris players who pay attention to meta is that, in 2. Edit: I also think that playing pacifists is definitely the go-to way to try playing a tall empire, since you're kinda forced into it, as you can't conquer other empires territory. Playing tall is not only possible, it's insanely powerful and (on Insane), I am always the most powerful empire in the galaxy by 2400. Everyone is talking about “playing tall” but what does that actually mean in Stellaris? Are we all on the same page about what it means?. Flashbacks to Vic 2 sphere system. Jump to latest Follow Reply. Tall builds could opt for a characteristic that gives them a tech boost but at the cost of maybe doubling the influence needed for outposts. 3 comments. 13. ago. Best. You stick to yourself, and they like it. Your main species is fine for gaia worlds and relic worlds, but anything else will require a different species. Currently, playing tall is neither fun nor competitive if you ask me. I like my little bubble of about 20-25 systems, depending on what is in them or what they are. NB: this is system not planet. We have "wide with many systems" and "wide with few systems, but those systems contain thirty billion habitats". Top 1% Rank by size. Unyielding lets you support more Starbases, which means more room for Hydroponics buildings, which means more food without needing to devote pops to producing it. Now it could be said if your wide with a tall build you have succeed so can tank the drop in efficiency. Sero Mar 25 @ 2:18am. Trying to conquer whole empire's as soon as met them and have a stronger fleet. "Tall" as compared to "wide" is generally presumed to be going really high development on a low number of cities/planets (depending on your game), rather than low development of. Method 1: Find a local AI, preferably one that is considerably more powerful, and between you and the baddies. 0 has brought massive changes to how buildings are acquired, how pops grow and how districts work. Stellaris Real-time strategy Strategy video game Gaming. 6 did: it removed the single functionality that provided a mechanical incentive. imo, ethics, materialist research speed bonus is great, and robots are an extra source of pops, so it is excellent. They are more diplomatic than a typical empire, as you'll want at least a couple friends to establish commercial pacts with and build branch offices on their places. Stellaris was released in 2016, and it's only been six years. Also without guaranteed worlds if your unlucky you're forced to go to war or go tall. Keeping a small easily defended area is playing tall. If you want to learn in Stellaris How to Play Tall then this Stellaris Playing Tall Guide is right for YOU! I'll be going everything you need to know in Playing Tall in. Stellaris How To Start well in Grand Admiral New and Experienced Player Guide / Tutorial: The Starting Routine I use to get a good start in Grand Admiral gam. Usually, when I'm playing tall I only have 6-8 worlds and go maybe 25%-50% over my admin cap, but 90 total is only enough admin cap to have maybe 4 worlds and some systems without significantly going over. There are many other strategy games where this is a very applicable concept, as there are penalties and downsides to growing bigger that can make your empire less. Megastructures aren't the only way to succeed when playing tall. Stellatis is tough. 3 beta). Assuming you play 2. You can have 1/3rd of the galaxy and only 20 colonies, or 15 sectors and 50 habitats. Introduction Stellaris - How To Play Tall (2. A truly tall empire does not incur the sprawl in the first place. If you get stuck with it, ignore this step. also if you're mass vassalizing that's not really tall play, that's just playing wide with extra steps. Trade with AI using rare resources to get rid of workers. Though I do think it will be similar to other gs games were playing wide is by far the best strategy and building tall is more something to do while waiting for the next war or something. Trying to conquer whole empire's as soon as met them and have a stronger fleet. Today I have the first new basic build in a while. 2 or 1. Yes, and this is not Civ 5, this Stellaris. There are a couple of problems with playing tall. I could just settle and terraform more planets to make more stations, but that is a long term and expensive process. Admin cap is super important since you're more sensitive to sprawl penalty. Tall is restricting yourself to playing with fewer colonies and avoiding outward expansion. The softcap, even under the initial 3. Expansion: After Discovery comes a period of rapid expansion. Play Tall Trait for Stellaris. This guide was made for basic Stellaris Version Adams 1. Playing tall will give you a hefty chunk of feeling like a plotter, a devious schemer who carefully plans his eventual ascension to near godhood. True you can make them larger, but then that's 2 ascension perks as opposed to one. Open menu Open navigation Go to Reddit Home. Stellaris Real-time strategy Strategy video game Gaming comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment More posts you may likeMade it a research world to soak up all the Necrophage pops, and transferred some to buff up other worlds. The goal is to get an edge in tech and fill out systems. Megacorp is a way to be a massive galactic powerhouse as tall because with branches you aren't using pops for resources. The benefit from playing Tall should be that you make amends, and strong alliances with nearby neighbors, you're not a threat, and they like that. This mechanic of diminishing returns leads to two distinctly different play styles, wide and tall. To me, playing tall means investing resources in things that increase the efficiency of your pops, which allows you to produce roughly the. This mechanic takes your Colonies, Systems, Districts, Pops, and any Branch Offices you have and will give you penalties once you reach a certain point. Yeah, I actually agree I don't think Stellaris really has 'tall' playstyles because of the way pops and economics work, I don't think you so much as play tall, but as varying levels of efficient. 0 which made it very important as, while minerals are king, science is queen. You could do a subterranean origin with lithoid using reanimator civic…. I would however definitely recommend getting Utopia as soon as you can though, the sheer volume of content across all game phases. I would say going tall is even more viable now. Mind you, even when playing tall, I don't build them, I'd rather. For example, a well-placed machine uprising could kill the galactic emperor and end the imperium, or a rebellion could end up vassalizing its parent state, and forming its own bloc. Less pops equals less resources. There hasn't been since like 1. In just one year, that's 3600 minerals conserved. Tall builds are barely viable with DLCs, without them they're basically impossible. A Dyson Sphere is a vital part of a very tall empire, and the Science Nexus can similarly propel you centuries ahead of the pack when playing a very compact empire. r/Stellaris. "Tall" no longer exists in versions after that change. growing pops requires going wide and in stellaris pops are everything. Title says it all. A tall empire gets the resource benefit without the sprawl cost. Playstyles are how a player plans to tackle playing or even winning the game. Conventional wisdom is that playing wide is easier than playing tall, but my experience has been the opposite. Ryika Jan 29, 2022 @ 11:08pm. Go to Stellaris r/Stellaris • by Nimitz-View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. 2; Reactions: Reply. TLDR, I think tall isnt dead, it is just more gradient. GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. After a while, re-change your pops so that those on habitats get great specialist traits and those on planets get good worker traits. You get more and more ways to focus your power inward. Ryika Jan 29, 2022 @ 11:08pm. What i would really like, is to play a geographically small empire but with high population planets and systems (i believe it's possible to have pops on a space platform, but i never seen them). Sorry mate but it kinda sounds more like you are just being a sore loser here. The tall vs wide playstyle has devolved from: tall (low systems low planets) vs wide (many systems many planets) to a new style of tall (low systems many planets/Habs) vs wide as it was before. large number of poorly developed planets. Tall empires are easier to defend from. Totally viable. Could you. Void Dwelling Megacorp is strong but unless you can balance the Influence (Not as bad now but still tight) and alloys early game. 0 changed that, claiming systems increases tech cost as well as planets, but now population doesn't increase tech cost. In Stellaris, some people play tall by only using a single planet, some go for a small number, like your starting 3, etc. But it doesn't. I'd like to see Stellaris travel down this route with a focus on corruption and general population unrest the farther out a colony is settled to the point where your fringe worlds need a constantly police or military presence to keep subdued unless you. A “tall” game usually involves investing in and building up your local empire rather than focusing on expansion. Either that. I believe this is OPS's most valuable asset. You cannot go tall, becuase you have already cut off your legs and stumped your hands by going standard hive. In the current beta branch, I’m running a megacorp. While habitats are good, it’s probably better to be funding colony ships. You can do quite well by building a few colonies on nice big planets, and using wars to establish a lot of vassals and tributaries. and the edicts and all the other bonuses from low empire size aren't enough as a semi wide empire would be. Go for Bio-Ascension for cloning vats. Okay, first things first, if you PLAN to play tall go for the pacifist build and just switch out later on. It made the rest of the game very easy, getting a quarter population boost and the large Gaia world, as well as a massive territory free for the taking. He is punching well above his weight, and would be a strong player in multiplayer. Best. If you play as a non gestalt empire you can invest your influence into arcology projects for city planets. Byzantine is a personal favourite of mine, and whilst playing tall admin sprawl is usually an issue. Paradox you're doing it all wrong. But the tall/wide distinction isn’t all that meaningful in Stellaris — you’re still managing more worlds and taking up more empire size, just in a smaller geographical space. 3 and my solutions for it. Flag was a pyramid symbol with yellow and black (split down the middle) yellow as the primary I think. The first 1000 people who click the link will get 2 free months of Skillshare Premium: Playing Tall has always been one of the more elu. It is way to easy to spam Burocrats to avoid any penalties from rapid expansion. 0 wide was getting as many planets as possible while taking the large tech negatives from having those planets. Use the outpost cost ethic and build plenty of outposts. The faster you can fill up your planets the better, as you're going to be going wide VERY fast and grabbing every planet you can see. Building Tall Pacifist Empire. Assuming your goal is to win, which version of Stellaris was playing "tall" a valid strategy of winning? Because in my experience, (I started around 1. Intro Stellaris Tall Guide Montu Plays 130K subscribers Subscribe Subscribed 3. Megacorp fits very neatly for tall empires, given trade's (somewhat) reduced reliance on planets and pops, and their penalty to empire size. When I play tall, and only conquer like 10-12 systems, and find good chokepoints, and focus on tech and development on my worlds, I end up with 100s of each resource per month, and by midgame every non-FE empire is 'inferior' to me. Throughout my (noobish) playthroughs of Stellaris I have always tried to play wide. The core mechanics of Stellaris are absolutely compatible with Tall vs Wide, it is just that wide has had repeated postive improvements over the course of the games development, frequently at the expense of tall play. It's not about having few planets - in fact you should still get as many ( properly developed!!Stellaris Real-time strategy Strategy video game Gaming. If you're spamming habitats, you aren't playing tall. r/Stellaris. This way, I can research powerful weapons and shields for my Corvette and Cruiser swarm. There is no tall game-play in Stellaris, in the sense of having a very few or small number of super planets vs. Thread starter Vampiresoap; Start date Apr 25, 2017; Jump to latest Follow Reply Menu We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. When people say they're playing tall in Stellaris, they generally mean one of two things: Either they're just playing a small nation, or they're playing a "compact" nation, with large numbers of habitats/ringworlds in a small number of systems. Tall since well, ever, hasn’t been a great option but now more. Though to be honest, it doesn't really change my strategy in Stellaris all that much. If you happen to trigger a certain precursor, but then the areas where their events can spawn end up occupied by other empires, you can be left with 0/6 hints. Other good tradition trees for Void Dwellers include Domination (more influence and housing), Prosperity (more minerals, more specialist output, another building slot). Now that every system increases tech costs by a flat rate playing tall is merely minmaxxing system ownership. I can't give you much perspective specific to your year as I can't be bothered to micromanage like that. 3. How to Manage Empire Size in Stellaris. It is viable to for example use diplomacy and just build shit loads of habitats to grow populations and form alliances and federations and mostly invade to create new versions of your own empire and include them in your federations. Stellaris. A small mod that actually re-balances the Tall vs. Jump to latest Follow Reply. Tall vs Wide is now about unity. Essentially, tall and wide shouldn’t be wildly different as far as pop count goes. The other is increased Trade for Xenophile, the Megacorp's Default Capital ruler job Executive and their unity job Manager make trade on the side of their primary output. Thanks. Wide and Tall strategies for Stellaris have changed drastically over the last 3 years. I have been getting back into this game for the past few weeks and i am still unsure how some things work. Playing tall or playing wide, which is better!? Most players start by building and advancing their empires in stellaris with a typical : expand, then build out planets and other parts. How to play tall (yes again) Alright so I've been doing a little research and i know there is a bunch of threads about this already but hear me out. Today I have the first new basic build in a while. Tall is not efficient, it only gets you what you need and often pertains slaving. The meta has shifted a lot throughout Stellaris’s life cycle and will likely shift a lot more in the future. Evokes a kind of 'hazard warning' feeling. Things have changed now, and playing tall is far from the powerhouse strategy it once was. My 2 cents: tall and wide is a bit nebulous. You will be slightly less ahead, as the AI here is much better at tech, but still a massive lead. the best origins for making the game harder are: Doomsday. If you're spamming habitats, you aren't playing tall. The system is the backbone of Stellaris. Is there any viable way to play void devellers besides commerce-tech build P. . We will use these. When I play tall, and only conquer like 10-12 systems, and find good chokepoints, and focus on tech and development on my worlds, I end up with 100s of each resource per month, and by midgame every non-FE empire is 'inferior' to me. It was not fun. Bureaucrats killed tall. 1. 06c (updated 11/14/05). Subscribe to downloadChoices Matter: Tall vs. Also, I have never played with catalytic treatment. Twenty systems is the breakpoint where number of systems owned raises your starbase cap, which is why it is sometimes given as a guide point. ago. Since you play pretty much the same if you have 50 habitats rather then 50 planets. You can still play that way. I'm playing xenophile/pacifist, with the idea of growing tall and defend the galaxy against the endgame crisis. The game has been around since 2016 and they. Even a faction with a single city all game. Forcing it to inevitably conquer them as time goes on No it doesn't. Yeah, I actually agree I don't think Stellaris really has 'tall' playstyles because of the way pops and economics work, I don't think you so much as play tall, but as varying levels of efficient. One last tip about resettling pops to take ruler jobs: with slaver guilds, you may have to resettle 3 pops total to fill 2 ruler jobs on a newly conquered planet. Tall means you really stack all you have onto a few systems. You'll have tall/wide elements in all empires depending on how you play, whether you're role-playing or not, whether you're playing single or multi and also your ethos and civics. If you can't open branch offices for various reasons probably nearby AI hives, megacorps, xenophobes etc use early game economy bro expand or whatever and reform into a normal empire soon ditching the megacorp part of the build. Tall gameplay does not exist in Stellaris. Tall builds are barely viable with DLCs, without them they're basically impossible. Playing tall refers to the strategy of empowering a small realm. OP, there currently is no such thing as a tall build for this game. NB: this is system not planet. If you make playing wide miserable thats bad too, because for many painting the map is. I have two flavours playing stellaris, super nice super diplomatic empire or devouring swarm. z0rbakpants • 2 yr. Tall vs Wide in Stellaris isn't a dichotomy, but rather a spectrum from one extreme to the other. You can still play that way. 48. Report. Kind of wish there were multiple assembly slots. There is no such thing as “playing tall” in Stellaris. Playing tall is a long-term strategy, so players should generally start using it. For how to: watch some of montuplays newest guides regarding playing tall. Here's what I personally like to do, and it works for me playing tall. Pre-ftl civilizations could also arise. Top 1% Rank by size. The current raiding playstyle (whether from civic or ascension perk) is worthless. And yes, having only say, 10-15 systems and using habitats and stuff to build them up is playing tall. The big idea with playing tall will. HopeFox • 6 yr. Unlike Civ, we don't really have a hard dichotomy that swings one way or the other. Empire strategy that minimizes empire size. After 2. How to play tall in stellaris: Switch your game version in the steam launcher to something from 30 years ago before admin cap jobs were added. The Hegemon is easily the best Origin in Stellaris, and with good reason. Jun 14, 2021 2. 4 planets that are high ascension level and low empire sprawl is tall, since in current Stellaris, each planet is basically the equivalent to an entire city in a game like Civilization. Habitats are incredibly bad now. ChronicallyDepressed. 87 Badges. 3 is a bad idea. 8 tall isn't as viable anymore, can anyone give me a fleshed out strategy/perspective?If you're playing wide that sprawl is very low. As a result, my mineral and energy credit production is a bit stunted until later in the. This is a synergy-guide, not a min-max guide, for playing Necrophage origin. Report. Introduced with the title's Utopia expansion, habitats act as a tool that enables playing tall. Make sure to grab voidborn and fill the habitats with energy pops and use the merchant enclaves to grab minerals. Acquire nihilistic acquisition (requires apocalypse dlc) and then try to fight long wars where you capture as many pops as possible. How to play tall in stellaris: Switch your game version in the steam launcher to something from 30 years ago before admin cap jobs were added. Hello, since the Galactic Comunity came out with Federations, I been trying to get towards the frists empires that have the most Diplomatic Weight, however, my playstle are mostly playing tall, with few sectors and planets on it, and with a 1000 Star and 25 empires, it seemed that wide empires tend to have more diplomatic weight because they. This is really very unplayable for me, i hate playing wide, and playing tall I just. You can also do this as a machine intelligence but its entirely a different strategy. 20 comments. Tall vs Wide. Since tall isn't a particularly viable long-term strategy, however, skipping those structures and investing the resources into widening your empire is likely more optimal. Hi, I always play tall, up to 5 colonies, but right now I see it as dumb thing to do due to how easy it is to increase your empire sprawl limit with bureaucrats. It's not about having fewer planets, but about having less directly controlled space. Best. 273 upvotes · 38 comments. So does pop assembly, which comes from one-per-colony buildings. 3. Planets and habitats within the same system counts as one system (but all there pops go towards pops penalty) The 0,01 penalty is the 1% penalty to research for each pop over 10 you have in your kingdom. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the 4X grand strategy game Stellaris by…. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the 4X grand strategy game Stellaris by Paradox Development Studio. 3. Fluffy-Tanuki Agrarian Idyll • 4 mo. Stellaris. Yeah, it would be nice if the game supported playing tall. Honestly you should know better too. I explored my immediate area, only went after systems that were "behind" chokepoints (from an outside perspective), and tried to get the basic strategic resources (motes. 29 comments Best [deleted] • 1 yr. That's what 2. So a big issue with the proposed addition of sprawl penalties to pops (in addition to systems, planets and districts) is that it is a huge nerf to the tall strategy, which is bad since wide is already the clearly dominant strategy (since the tech/tradition penalty directly benefits "tall" play vs "wide" play, but is widely regarded as being. The pop growth bonus in particular is also augmented by the bonuses of xenophobe, for a possible 30% base pop growth. Tall v wide is a bit of a false construct in stellaris specifically (always has been). You can make the argument that 2. Originally posted by twistedmelon: Tall is still a strategy, but it is more grey. Now, the Hives that eat people have it easier: Expand like the fckn spanish flu and produce food by eating people. Any void dwellers build with militarist. 0 playing "tall" was nebulous at best. Empire Size currently provides a rubber band on big empires being better than small empires. Clone army with the Ascendant path since you get 100 pops with +40% ruler output and +20% specialist output. Paradox you're doing it all wrong. After that take the angler civic, agrarian idyll and when you get the third one take catalytic converter as thats key to the whole build. . The S Tier only features the best of the best Origin available in Stellaris. Then tried a mixed economy run aimed at going tall and setting up strong vassals but was stymied when I realized 3 planets in 28 systems was incredibly unlucky and having anamoly researchers was actually. This is the truth. The extremes, right and left, are in the gutters. Megacorp fits very neatly for tall empires, given trade's (somewhat) reduced reliance on planets and pops, and their penalty to empire size. I have been thinking about something like this since playing a tall Void Dwellers game right after a very successful wide Overtuned game, but the work involved in sorting it all out was. 5K Online. Ecumenopolis helps immensly, as does subjugating half the galaxy for the energy credits. There's 2 ways to play Stellaris. The tall playstyle dines like a gourmet only picking the very best and shunning the crud. . It would mimick a wide play power curve, but with a tall looking empire. That doesn't mean a low amount of colonies; in fact, often more. In 5 hours I will play Stellaris with my friends. That destroys federations) remove term limit. In terms of strong tall builds that actually perform well, there are basically only two: Habitat Spam, and the Nihilistic Acquisition Raider. 2. Currently bigger empires (ie conquest) is just stronger due to the fact that you can just increase your empire sprawl endlessly (ie no science loss from bigger empires) and the ai has weird ship designs and uses buildings suboptimally. Highly stable, unified group thats close proximity keeps together. Pick Aptitude as your first tradition to get +1 trait. One of the simplest ways is to either stand on a chair or wear high heels but it's not very comfortable on the long run. It's not strictly bad, but the research speed is better. The problems with Stellaris, tall empires, 3. In Stellaris, you don't make that choice. 0, is quite annoying due to the new pop cap for large empires. the best ways to play tall are either: a trade empire (megacorp would be the best) because the best planet types (ecumenopolis/ring world) are the best for generating trade and trade does fully cover energy, consumer goods and unity production. They have a 100 pop max capacity and 35% bonus on specialist/ruler output. How can I play tall, and how good are my chances of being to defend against a large chunk of the galaxy? I have a 10k star fortress with 12 platforms and my entire fleet parked in the hyper lane entrance to my systems. Having lots of systems is not a wide play-style, having. I don't want to own any vassals. Thread starter Tuna Cat;. Given that in civ you can win without conquering anything, a tall empire doesn't have to transition to a wide empire, but in stellaris there isn't much to do if you don't conquer people, and given the way how the research and productions currently work, playing tall is not a very valid choice unless you become boxed in very early on. Ladies and gentlemen Tall has returned! In this video I will be showing off my latest Stellaris Meta Build; Tall Agrarian Ocean Paradise. Ethics, Civics, Traditions and other choices strongly support or hinder certain Playstyles. This may promote a "tall" growth of your empire, certainly helped by the presence of the Ecumenopolis, however this is a strategy that still has to find its place in the Stellaris meta. The player "developed" these systems to the heights of their abilities, using Habitats and Ringworlds. There are several reasons for this but the primary factors are how pops are obtained, how resources are produced, and the way new things are created. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the 4X grand strategy…The main problem is that Stellaris is a game of resources and pops are the most precious one, tall empires are awful in those regards and they also run the risk of lagging behind in the tech department which is bad. At 200 population (which isn't big enough. . I'm considering turning down habitable worlds. Playing tall is using the minimal amount of worlds, rather then the minimal amount of systems. #56. ago. Tall is NOT Pops over Systems. 0. . In Stellaris I can use my influence to grow wider by building starbases or settling colonies. ago. ) Playing Tall is a very special type of empire. Absolutely insane for a research capital and tall empire. Hey guys, I'm not very good at this game, i played 3 times on ensign now and i have not really become more powerful than other civilizations. that's the cure. If you're going for clone ascendant, you really don't want to be slavers on top of that, otherwise you're just locking yourself to 5 planets until you research synthetics. ago The_Godfather69 The Definitive Guide For "How To Play Tall" In Stellaris Console Edition Video This video is my Guide for: How to Play Tall in Stellaris Console. r/Stellaris. Planets are capped in tiles, jobs and housing. Technology_Training • 3 mo. If you want to be able to play Tall, play Endless Legend. This would be opposed to expanding further into space through star bases or. There are a lot of very easy to make changes that would make the choices a lot more equal if not perfect.